You mentioned things like the footwork not changing. Better to say that the rules of what-causes-what behind the footwork haven't change, but the footwork actually danced has, because it had to in order to maintain the same rules of causality when circumstances changed.
You noticed that the usage of the knees has changed. That's a perfect example - if you lower more in your knees, for the feet to work the same way they did previously, they will not have to do things a little bit differently. With more lowering in the knees, the rise and fall in the feet is constrained to only the upper part of the overall rise and fall rather than being the majority of the overall. As a result, you'll see in many instances that the heel goes down sooner in the overall course of the step, becuase the touchdown of the heel is no longer the end of the lowering - the lowering continues long after, in the bend of the knee, and of course we want the completion of the lowering to bear about the same relation to the end of the step as it did in the days when we weren't using our knees so much.
Different circumstances + same rules = different details.