To whoever. The amount of rise is related to the speed the music is being played. More time. More rise. Does that make sense or not.
It would seem to make sense but it's just not correct. It should be obvious that despite similar tempos among waltz, foxtrot, and tango, all require different amounts of rise and fall, due to the character of the dance, partly as described to us by the MUSIC, partly as described to us by the roots of the dance.
What about tango says "no rise and fall"? Is it the tempo of the music? Of course not, it's the nature of the music. Same goes for waltz (very rotary in nature), and foxtrot (very linear, thus resulting in fewer peaks and more straight line travel). Even quickstep, with its fast tempo, will have LOTS of rise, more so than in the slow foxtrot.