Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Dynamics.
Posted by terence2
7/25/2008  9:50:00 AM
I believe the pre dominant theorist in the " physics " of dance was Scrivener.

Not only writing about it, it was also part of his daily teaching mantra .

I dont remember Walter being as specific as Len .

Walter was very technical and body " shape " oriented as i recall, whereas Len was more about the " dynamics " that produced movement for flight ( among the other important aspects )
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by SocialDancer
7/25/2008  4:12:00 AM
"date ? .. please"

My guess would be around 1925, which pre-dates anything in my library.
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by Iluv2Dance
7/25/2008  5:14:00 AM
Hi to all,
Thank you for showing an interest in my post. My 'quote' came from, 'The Ballroom Dancer's Handbook', by A.H.FRANKS, reprinted in 1944.

I found the following LINK to be very interesting regarding dance books.

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/9101/bib/B11.html
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by jofjonesboro
7/25/2008  6:16:00 AM
Thanks for the link, luv2.

The list is very interesting. It seems to exclude Howard and Scrivener (but I could be mistaken).

jj
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by terence2
7/25/2008  8:39:00 AM
The name " threw " me momentarily...

Rumsey was one of the original committee members who were involved in the " standardisation " of the various teaching Soc. in the late 20s.

I knew I had heard the name, but not being a dancer of any note, he was also a contributing editor to the " Dancing Times " .

My guess is he picked up the term from one of the better known dancers and coaches of that era ?, like maxwell stewart or even alex himself .

was not aware he had written a tome.

Goes to show ya.. always something to learn !
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by Polished
7/26/2008  12:01:00 AM
It is refreshing that some people are intersted in the history of Ballroom Dancing. What should be pointed out is the Imperial Society ISTD already existed before Ballroom came onto the scene. And many years before Alex Moore was approched to write a Technique Book. P.J S. Richardson with several leading Professionals, none of whome were a members of the ISTD contemplated forming a Society for Ballroom Dancing

He was interviewed by the secerary of the Imperial and gave an understanding if they would take it out of his hands there would be no need for a new society.
The year was 1924 that the new section was formed.Which was Josephine Bradly. Eve Tyngate-Smith . Lisl Humphrey and Victor Silvester
3 to 1 for the ladies. Only one was a married woman. They made the rules for the syllabus that the candidates had to pass to become a member.
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by terence2
7/26/2008  12:07:00 AM
Actually, it was 1928.. and there were 20 members invited to the conference .
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by Polished
7/26/2008  12:26:00 AM
Terence. Victor Silvester was there and he writes 1924 Four members. Page 7. Victor Silvester Modern Ballroom Dancing. 1929 was the first time the Quickstep was included in the Star Ballroom Championship in which was won by Frank Ford and Molly Spain. 1928 was the year Maxwell Stewart won the British Professional Championship organized by the Dancing Times and the Imperial. I've got eighteen pages of history here from before the first World War to the modern times.. Cheers.
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by terence2
7/26/2008  1:11:00 AM
That meeting was for content and EXAM standardisation... it took 4 more yrs to convene ALL the then Soc. to accept the proposal, of which there were 20 attendees representing various bodies .

incidentally, it is not the ISTD which is the oldest Soc. but the BATD, formed in 1892 .
The DMA in the States, pre dates that .
Re: Dynamics.
Posted by Iluv2Dance
7/26/2008  2:30:00 AM
Hi Terence,
Don't know if it is still true today, but the ISTD had the following paragraph in their Ballroom Examination Syllabus.

/* Candidates who stutter shall be permitted to answer questions on theory in written papers, subject to a medical certificate being furnished beforehand. */

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com