What an issue.

Since different books describe the figures differently, a description should specify how the steps are taken. Keh's description is for the leader stepping fwd S on the RF, then fwd Q on the LF, and fwd Q OP on the RF and I'm going to use the same. Keh's description is right for a basic timing. The S would be taken on the 1, the 1st Q on the 3, and the 2nd Q on the 4. This is a straight, plain, old SQQ rhythm.
I've also been to classes where we were taught a more advanced timing. The general concept behind it is that the S is all of two beats; you can actually put your foot down anywhere within that time span and still be on time. Similarly for the whole beat of a Q. I'm sure there are variations on this, too, but the way my regular teachers explained it was to take the S step on 2, the 1st Q on 3, and the 2nd Q on the & after 4. This is supposed to be a bit more musical than a straight SQQ/134 timing because you're stretching out the counts a little bit. If you count the duration of time between the foot placements, you don't get 2, 1, 1, you get 1, 1.5, 1.5. That's why this timing can be rather confusing, especially to beginners. However, I attended a workshop where the teacher explained this sort of timing by breaking down the motions the body has to go through. The way he/she (I forget) explained it, the timing made a lot more sense. My regular teachers didn't give the same sort of breakdown so it was harder for me to understand why and exactly how we were stretching out the counts.
I'd suggest starting off with the standard SQQ/134 rhythm and dance foxtrot like that. Once you're used to that and gain some more skills at dancing it (int'l foxtrot is notoriously difficult to do well), you can try moving on to a more advanced timing.
--
James Marshall
marshall@astro.umd.edu http://www.astro.umd.edu/~marshall[This message was edited by Dronak on 07-27-02 at 03:22 PM.]