Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

re: man no body turns less when lady OP?
Posted by terence
2/13/2000  4:36:00 AM
Jonathan

i do believe there is a reason behind but we just dont know yet. it seems to have a rule as i said. it appears on group of figures, not a particular one. keep in touch.

terence

re: man no body turns less when lady OP?
Posted by Jonathan Atkinson
2/13/2000  4:18:00 AM
Interesting point... I'll have to look into that. It's too prominent to be an oversight or typo, so I'm sure there's a reason. Usually when there's a seeming contradiction, there's a reason. In other words, they're trying to convey a particular technical point.

I'll get back to you when I learn something about it.

Jonathan

Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com