Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

re: Emerald Ball 2002
Posted by Laura
5/23/2002  8:42:00 AM
Lyndie, the "who is this comment" is a joke ... check out some of the other photos in the "learn to dance" sections of this site
re: Emerald Ball 2002
Posted by ninedancer
5/13/2002  7:21:00 PM
Yeah, I took this picture. Unfortunately it came out blurrier than I would have liked. I've been hearing a rumor that they want to ban still cameras at comps... that would suck; I enjoy taking my own pictures.

I hadn't been to Emerald for the past two years. Overall, this was a positive experience. Despite being the most expensive comp, there was actually a semi-final in open amateur smooth, which made us happy

It was great just to go out and dance and temporarily forget about all the USABDA/NDCA nonsense.

Any other thoughts?

--Porfirio

"Do or do not, there is no try," Yoda, Episode V
Ban cameras??
Posted by TheDitz
5/20/2002  2:53:00 PM
How in the heck can they do that? Half of the competitions in SF, don't even have a professional photographer anymore. (Besides, the guy that takes the award photos that is.)
Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com